This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Created the article. Actually, coming from a non-survival-of-Roman-admin perspective, it looks like a a cleric was fitting native Welsh concepts into a context where the words had to be expressed in a Latin (ie, Roman) context, so he wrote "one of the Men of Gwynedd" as "citizen", and "steward or maer" as "magistrate", confident that people would understand what was meant. However, the notable historians quoted in the article all seem to have missed my excellent interpretation. Notuncurious (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That does actually seem like a plausible explanation to me, but of course you'd have to find a reliable source that states that. Don't know why no academic has presented that sort of explanation, but then I'm no expert in this subject. --Hibernian (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
