Talk:Cardiff city centre

Cardiff Top‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with St. Mary Street/High Street[edit]

I disagree with the proposed merger. St. Mary Street/High Street is one of the most important streets in Cardiff, along with Queen Street. It has plenty of history and with more edits I'm sure it could be a very useful article all by itself. Seth Whales (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement[edit]

If anyone is in Cardiff city centre, please try and take some photos. There is a lot of information missing from this article and no decent photos showing important areas of the city. Thank you. Welshleprechaun (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The images at Geograph can be imported and used - unfortunately I won't be able do it myself for a few weeks as my PC has died, but anyone else can have a go! Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What images would you like? Seth Whales (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B-class[edit]

To try to get this article to B-class, could other editors please take a look at the B class criteria and suggest what needs improvement? Thanks Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

More needed. Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Though generally references have been added in the article since 2009 (and the headline 'refimprove' box could be removed), there are large Sections that have no references at all - maybe a refimprove box could be added, instead, to the rogue Sections? Sionk (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive and Accurate[edit]

Good structure[edit]

My idea is each district has three paragraphs. First:Importance/Features? Second:History Third: Location/Access Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well Written[edit]

More on history is needed Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From what point are we taking the city centre's history? From 1905 when city status was granted? I was about to add something about the medieval town walls, but maybe that will be a duplication to the main Cardiff article. Sionk (talk) 01:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations/Images etc.[edit]

Sufficient I think, but more would improve article. Add infobox. Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broad and Accessible[edit]

I think so. Welshleprechaun (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move back to Cardiff city centre[edit]

I propose to move the article back to Cardiff city centre. Cardiff city centre is a general term for the centre of Cardiff with no exact borders. This is the same for Leeds city centre and Manchester city centre, where it is description of the area and not the actual name. Please indicate if you support or oppose. Seth Whales (talk) 19:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Makes sense to me. Daicaregos (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pondle (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ham 17:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Moochocoogle (talk) 03:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested the move by a Bureaucrat. Seth Whales (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm happy to move the page, but note that any admin can complete moves like this - it doesn't have to be a bureaucrat. Warofdreams talk 16:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In that case, should Swansea City Centre be moved? Welshleprechaun (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cardiff city centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120805204441/http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/content.asp?nav=2868%2C2964%2C4981&parent_directory_id=2865 to http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/content.asp?nav=2868%2C2964%2C4981&parent_directory_id=2865

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]