Talk:Carer

Contested move request[edit]

The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days, the request will be removed from WP:RM. —Stemonitis 06:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carer → Carers —(Discuss)— Carer as a singular noun is a dictionary definition, not an encylopedia article, whilst Carers signifies a collective social movement in all societies with an aging population that has major social and economic implications —Excalibur 19:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is proposed that Carer be renamed and moved to Carers, for the reason that carer is merely a dictionary definition of an individual in an unpaid caring role, whilst Carers is a widely-used term in most English speaking countries to denote a social and political class or movement of persons who look after an elderly or disabled relative or friend without payment. Excalibur 19:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntary caregiver was moved to Carers yesterday (violating the naming convention preferring singular titles and quite possibly WP:ENGVAR as well). A move to Carer would have required a listing here and wouldn't have been uncontroversial - for that matter, the target page wouldn't have been a redirect, although it quite possibly should be. For that reason, Carers should be moved back to Voluntary caregiver, and then we can discuss the correct location of the page in a properly-listed discussion here. Dekimasu よ! 23:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although not a binding discussion, the Voluntary caregiver title was agreed upon as the result of a previous AfD for "carers": Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carers. Dekimasu よ! 23:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Return carers to voluntary caregiver, merge the stub at carer with voluntary caregiver, then discuss moves if desired. — AjaxSmack 14:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]