Talk:Caretaker Prime Minister of Pakistan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move to ‘Caretaker Government in Pakistan’[edit]

@Panam2014:, @Wiki.0hlic:, @Saqib:, Seeing as it would be tedious to create pages for Caretaker CMs of each provinces, could this be moved to a new page, such as ‘caretaker government in pakistan’ where everything about the caretaker system can be explained? Masterpha (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • oppose we have 10 caretakers PM since 1993. It is a long list. We should create a new article. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • support I concur. The Caretaker government's role is a transient one, often limited to a couple of months. It is focused mainly on conducting elections in between proper governments. So, I believe, it doesn't warrant separate pages, if it can be avoided. I think, instead of standalone pages, a unified page elaborating on federal and provincial composition of said caretaker governments under L2 headings is quite practical and logical. - Wiki.0hlic (talk) 19:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muzzzmuzzmuzzz and M.Ashraf333: do you have a solution? expending the current article or create new articles is needed now. Panam2014 (talk) 02:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s better to just create one article called “Caretaker governments in Pakistan”. And just have subsections for “Federal” and for each province. Would be nice to have everything in one place. Muzzzmuzzmuzzz (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Muzzzmuzzmuzzz: and add the amendment which created the office. Panam2014 (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think I agree with Masterpha and this page should be moved rather than creating a new page. Caretaker Prime Minister and Caretaker Chief Minister themselves are not that important as they are all already listed in their respective pages, which defeats the usefulness of this page. I think this page should be moved and something should be written about the caretaker government instead of creating a list of caretaker prime ministers and caretaker chief ministers.M.Ashraf333 (talk) 11:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @M.Ashraf333: I could support the title Care-taker Prime Minister and Chief Minister of Pakistan to match with Constitution. Panam2014 (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jibran1998, M.Ashraf333, Masterpha, Saqib, and Wiki.0hlic: time to made a decision. Support renaming. Panam2014 (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I can get behind supporting a move to a page where all care-taker governments are included Jibran1998 (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muzzzmuzzmuzzz: I think it is time to move the article. Panam2014 (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes I agree Muzzzmuzzmuzzz (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think it can be moved because an article called Caretaker government of Pakistan already exists. It's better to leave this article as it adheres to all Wiki standards. War Wounded (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ainty Painty and War Wounded: we could merge. Panam2014 (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose: The current structure of individual page(s) provides a clear and focused view of their respective roles and actions during their limited tenures. Merging them all into a single article might lead to information overload and dilute the unique characteristics of each article. Furthermore, the caretaker governments play a significant role in maintaining stability during the transitional period between regular governments, and separating their profiles allows for a more in-depth exploration of their actions and impact. Instead of a broad overview, readers might benefit from the detailed insights that individual pages offer. Therefore, I oppose the idea of moving to a unified page. Ainty Painty (talk) 15:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caretaker[edit]

Is the caretaker PM setup unique to Pakistan? If it is, it should be mentioned in the article. // sikander { talk } 13:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]