Talk:Carlton Colville

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia: Suffolk Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suffolk task force.

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Carlton Colville. -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Carlton Colville Primary School seems non-notable and would probably not survive an AfD. Typically such articles are merged to the location. I suggest this be done in this case and a redirect created. Opinions? Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, inactivity certainly suggests merging then... Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Plane[edit]

There was plane crash in Carlton Colville during the second world war (I believe). The type of plane was a Flying Fortress. There is now a road on the site where the plane crashed called Fortress Way, I think there are other roads in the area of which there names are linked to the pilots who died during the crash. If the information can be cited it should be added to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.18.238 (talk) 00:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Town Status[edit]

It has been reported that Carlton Colville is now a town and therefore the article should be changed accordingly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.252.32 (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting - thanks. I'm not sure whether or not it's technically a "town" rather than the council having the technical name of a town council - certainly I'd argue very strongly that geographically it remains a suburb more than anything. I think the way I've worked the wording will more or less suffice for now though - but would very much welcome opinions. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you at least consider mentioning something about its town status, maybe even just a little sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.251.157 (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second sentence of the first paragraph is where it's at. Any refs from the Journal or EDP would be helpful if anything more's to be made of it I think. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlton Colville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105022049/http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000972.pdf to http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1000972.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The link wasn't dead so I've marked this as failed. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carlton Colville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]