Talk:Carlton Mellick III

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Tags[edit]

I readded the tags removed without discusion by an anon. i understood that "primary source" tag to mean info is taken from sources written by the subject, hence they have limited use (is that not the case here)). The reffimprove tag is is indisputable: most of this still needs reliable third party sources.Yobmod (talk) 09:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary of first tagging: Added primary sources and cleanup templates; article is poorly written and has no reliable sources.

Jared Armstrong's court case[edit]

Not all of this is relevant to Carlton Mellick III, or the novel Satan Burger, and certainly not in the depth that it is applied. I'm going to put this in a separate controversy section after the list of works, and file it down a little. Feel free to mess around with it or revert edits if you think I've botched the job, but at the moment, it looks a little like a defence case for Armstrong - going directly against the whole concept of bias. Pianoabuser (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

These are some references that might help expand this article:

Oregonian Newspaper issue: Tuesday September 25th 2007 The Boys of Bizarro - Oregonian video interview for oregonlive.com Dazed and Confused Magazine Vol. 2, Issue 53 Vice Magazine - the fiction issue 2008 Locus Magazine - Issue 572 • Vol. 61 No. 3 The Magazine of Bizarro Fiction issue 2 Boing Boing blog The Guardian Booksblog

I'll need to expand these with ISBNs, etc. There are also many other references I should be able to track down. Avantpunkarmy (talk) 22:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another article on Carlton Mellick and bizarro fiction. It was at the Details Magazine website: http://www.details.com/celebrities-entertainment/music-and-books/201010/bizarro-fiction-wild-book-covers (Avantpunkarmy (talk) 08:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carlton Mellick III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]