Talk:Carmarthen–Aberystwyth line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 14, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Carmarthen to Aberystwyth RDT.

Article title[edit]

Is there any good reason why the word "to" has been left out of the article title, yet included elsewhere in the text? Loganberry (Talk) 11:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone? Either the "to" should be in the article title, or it should not be in the text. Which is correct? Loganberry (Talk) 00:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surely 'and' is the better term? 82.10.108.49 (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Interrupted'[edit]

Why is the Maesycrugiau to Pencader section shown with an 'Interrupted' dotted line in the diagram? There is no explanation of this. 87.194.80.255 (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is / was?[edit]

Re https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carmarthen_to_Aberystwyth_Line&curid=7436161&diff=739036691&oldid=738837839

This changes the article significantly from a historical article on a closed railway line to a speculative article about a new line built on the old alignment. The trouble is that this new plan is hardly a credible project: Wales does not have spare half-billions lying around for transport infrastructure, especially now post-Brexit. So is this plan, which is only at the feasibility study stage and hardly likely to go further, now more prominent than the concrete existence of a past line? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the plan does go anywhere, at the moment I think it merits a section titled something like "Future plans". It does not need to take over the article the way it has and barely merits a mention in the lead. Britmax (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Maybe just one sentence at the end of the (previous) introduction mentioning the possibility of re-opening? And if it does go ahead it may be useful to look at the Waverley Route/Borders Railway solution. Robevans123 (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Redhill to Tonbridge Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pencarreg Halt[edit]

Can someone please add Pencarreg Halt to the RDT which was situated between Lampeter and Llanybyther.Steamybrian2 (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Waterloo to Reading Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]