Talk:Caroline Sturdy Colls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy?[edit]

SPA version edited out[edit]

In the film, described the Smithsonian as being of the “watershed discovery of Star of David tiles confirms the existence of Treblinka's gas chambers,” Sturdy-Colls and fellow archeologist Ivar Schute are shown as incorrectly identifying the tile brand marks from the 125-year old Dziewulski i Lange porcelain factory in Poland as “Jewish Stars of David.”

The film contains the following sequence:

“As you see, the Star of David on the bottom, which is quite remarkable,” Schute tells Colls, and then asks her, “But have you ever seen the tiles?” Colls replies “No” and then Schute goes on to say that these tiles “fit in with the idea that we are in the area of the gas chambers.” Colls then says what “immediately springs to my mind is that witnesses who were allowed in the gas chamber and the area talked about the Star of David on the outside of the gas chamber building to build up the illusion that people were going to somewhere that was safe.” [1]

Coll’s claim that these tiles were “Stars of David” was repeated by the Israeli Ynet News service, which announced that “Tiles with the Star of David stamped on them were found by an archeological team in Treblinka and confirm the existence of gas chambers in the Nazi death camp.”[2]

In reality, the symbol found on the tiles is a 123-year old brand mark of the Dziewulski i Lange porcelain factory[3] and is a symbol is known in the heraldic world as a pierced mullet star.[4]

  1. ^ “The watershed discovery of Star of David tiles confirms the existence of Treblinka's gas chambers and becomes the key to reconstructing the death camp's sinister workings,”—Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine, Smithsonian Channel. [1]
  2. ^ Tiles found in Treblinka confirm existence of gas chambers, Ynet News, 03.30.14. [2]
  3. ^ 125 Years Of Tradition, OPOCZNO company website, [3]
  4. ^ Star (heraldry), Wikipedia, [4]

This completely accurate report on the Smithsonian documentary is not "antisemitic," it does not quote "antisemitic blogs," is fully referenced from recognizable and serious sources, and is a factual addition to the article. There is therefore no reason for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.255.108.119 (talkcontribs) Owego, New York

The description of her research should be based primarily on what the published academic sources say, not the bumblings of the popular press. One Wikipedia article is not a reliable source for another Wikipedia article and can never be used as a reference. The fact that the tile manufacturer intended no Jewish symbolism does not rule out the possibility that the Nazis may have co-opted the symbol to deceive the murder victims. There is no need to accuse another editor of bad faith without good evidence, and there is no such evidence here. Start editing collaboratively, please, instead of in a confrontational manner. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification[edit]

The above quoted version (alas, with slanderous differences removed), was first inserted by 70.44.231.120 (talk · contribs · count). Originally, it included extensively quoted free blog-post signed by a blogger whose other contributions to open-source forum hosted by The New Observer consisted of a collection of unrelated anti-Jewish diatribes. When the WP:RS rant by 70.44.231.120 was restored by 67.255.108.119 (talk · contribs · count) I naturally concluded that it was the same SPA user employing dynamic IPs in order to restore his preferred version. I might have been wrong in assuming that, because 70.44.231.120 is registered in Reading, Pennsylvania, and 67.255.108.119 is registered in Owego, New York. However, there are strict policies in Wikipedia regarding WP:LIVING which have to be followed. Therefore, I am adding more citations from reliable sources in support of the current version of this bio, thanks. Poeticbent talk 17:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Caroline Sturdy Colls. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Could you connect Colls' Polish tiles and "gas chamber". Could they have been trivets,etc.? This appears to not be serious analysis. 2601:181:8000:D6D0:30F2:FCF6:A6A1:C2A (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caroline Sturdy Colls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]