Talk:Cash-flow diagram

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cash-flow diagram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved: consensus not to move, SmokeyJoe's merger is being discussed at the appropriate venue. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 19:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Cash-flow diagramCash flow diagram – Consistency with Cash flow and Cash flow statementQzekrom (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. In this case, "cash-flow" is a compound modifier, so per MOS:HYPHEN it should be hyphenated. Otherwise it might be interpreted as a flow diagram which is cash, rather than a diagram which is cash-flow.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Cash flow statement should be retitled to Cash-flow statement; this one should not be changed. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Amakuru, but more importantly, ...
Merge and redirect to Cash flow. The sources are broken links, the article is a virtual orphan, and it is an extremely thin slice subtopic of cash flow. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed to merge both Cash flow and Cash-flow diagram into Cash flow statement. Cash flow and Cash-flow diagram are both very thin, barely watched, edited or downloaded thin slice forks of Cash flow statement. See Talk:Cash flow statement. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.