Talk:Catholic dogmatic theology

Catholicism Low‑importance

Catholic dogmatic theology is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Comment[edit]

Long lists of names and dates for each arbitrary epoch. Cataloging (or cataloguing) does have some merit, and additionally the wikilinks do provide some access to the intellectual trends per se. Overall, however, this article within itself doesn't elucidate, it merely categorizes in a superficial way. To that extent I think the article needs rewriting to bring understanding and insight to the supposed "general intelligent reader" that the encyclopedia is targeting. FeatherPluma (talk) 07:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While much more could be done, my compliments to the author, and I would disagree that the epochs are necessarily arbitary. Scholasticism is often used as a period piece in discussing Catholic theology (why is there no reference to "the schoolmen", the commonly used term?) I was looking up Dalmatius Kick, and this article gave him some context. Now I will try to work with the material more and .. possibly .. make some contributions. The fact that Erasmus is omitted, however, makes for a concern that there is some POV beyond elucidation involved. If the article is going to omit major Catholic historical individuals, even if they are in a sense contra "dogmatic theology", the reasons should be given (e.g. later considered heretical, do not fit conveniently in the current categories). Better, tweak the article to include.

StevenAvery.ny (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 September 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, therefore, moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History of Catholic dogmatic theology → Catholic dogmatic theology – Per WP:CONCISE (while slightly broadening the scope), but most importantly per WP:CONSISTENCY with Catholic theology. Compare the scope of Catholic theology: as it includes history, there is indeed no History of Catholic theology. Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.