Talk:Celeste Kidd

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

#MeToo advocacy section[edit]

This section of the article is incomplete, obviously prejudiced against Dr. Jaeger, and poorly supported by the citations. For example, op. cit. #15 focuses on another set of persons and a different university, and Jaeger's tenure is mentioned only in passing, and more importantly, it in no way states or implies that the tenure process was a result of or influenced by the ongoing investigation, which this article does. This section should be updated, corrected and brought inline with Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines, or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:189:8201:B000:6184:3783:3A4:5D5D (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason Article[edit]

It is noteworthy that two users, with no edits except to Celeste Kidd, Richard N. Aslin, and Jessica F. Cantlon are working to suppress and hide all evidence of the Reason article that shows that the investigation against Florian Jaeger was apparently malicious and without merit. At worst, this is sock-puppeting from one of those three individuals (or their close associates); at best, it is a politically-motivated attempt to avoid any counter-narrative -- which seems in keeping with the actions of Kidd, Aslin, and Cantlon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.42.21.228 (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will need multiple reliable sources discussing the details of the alleged smear campaign per WP:REDFLAG and WP:NPF. That reason article is not enough. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

lol, get outta here you absolute clown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.64.43.66 (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Objections to the following wording?[edit]

@Augmented Seventh: objects to the following wording:

Extended content
In 2016, Kidd alledged sexual harassment by T. Florian Jaeger, a tenured professor at the University of Rochester. The university closed the investigation before it spoke to witnesses Kidd named who could corroborate her claims

, and

Extended content

In response, the university paid $4.5 million for an outside investigation led by Mary Jo White which that the professor had made unprofessional decisions in a period from 2007 to 2010, but stated that they did not meet the threshold for sexual harassment under either the policies in force in 2007 or in the policy in force in 2020. The report further found that it did not meet the standard for criminal sexual harassment or retaliation, and found that the complainants' narrative was "largely without factual basis."

.

This wording is supported entirely by the cited sources, in particular ^[1].

I submit that this is the only appropriate wording, given that the source calls into serious question the factual accuracy of the allegations made. Reverting to the previous (and current wording), below undermines this and buries the lede. 142.157.236.100 (talk) 04:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) 142.157.236.100 (talk) 04:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Herzog, Katie (March 14, 2022). "How an Academic Grudge Turned Into a #MeToo Panic". Reason.

[1] Herzog, Katie (March 14, 2022). "How an Academic Grudge Turned Into a #MeToo Panic". Reason.

[1]