Talk:Center for Documentation of Cultural and Natural Heritage

Egypt Mid‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

to increase awareness[edit]

The pages talks about CULTNAT, that aims to increase the awarness of egypt's History and culture The centers affiliated with bibliotecha alexandrina, EGYPT

status[edit]

As reviewing admin, I did not delete it--but much of it was copied from the web site, which is not permitted, and discusses the general background of why Egypt's cultural heritage is so very important, and the world in general so greatly interested in it. While certainly true, it isn't necessary to go into it here--it is fully discussed in many other articles. I therefore removed those portions.

What needs to be done now is to briefly describe the other projects, making sure to use the web site only for information, but to rewrite it in a brief informative manner. And then what is needed is to find & add published references from external sources talking about the programs. DGG ( talk ) 21:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This still reads like a brochure, all sourced to CULTNAT's website, and full of hype-y material. I'm also dubious about the use of the imagery taken from the website - the editor listing as placing it into the public domain is User:CULTNAT, but as we know users cannot truly represent organizations, so the claim that the work is his to place in the public domain is dubious. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cultnat.org/Cultnat.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "About" section was a word-for-word copy. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

more copyvio had since been introduced. I've stubbed. It was a mess & needs to be rebuilt StarM 22:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]