Talk:Chaldean Syrian Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move of interest[edit]

In case anyone here wants to weigh in, Eastern Rite Catholic ChurchesEastern Catholic Churches: See Talk:Eastern Rite Catholic Churches. Fishhead64 07:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edessa Non-Chalcedonian?[edit]

I don't think it's really appropriate to refer to the Edessans associated with the Chaldean Syrian Church as "Non-Chalcedonians". The Non-Chalcedonian article indicates that the term refers to those who had accepted the Council of Ephesus, but because of their strong emphasis on the hypostatic unity of Christ felt that they could not accept the Council of Chalcedon. Before the expulsion of numerous scholars in the mid 5th century, however, Edessa was the center of those who followed Theodore of Mopsuestia, and had an opposite Christology to the Non-Chalcedonians and in contrast did not accept even the First Council of Ephesus. Thus, I think the name should be changed from "Non-Chalcedonian" to "Nestorian" or perhaps "Non-Ephesine". Deusveritasest (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on Common History[edit]

There are Six articles which claim common history of Saint Thomas Christians out of this 4 have almost similar contents about the same period. To avoid repetitive articles and to improve the quality of the article, share about WP:RELY sources and re organization of these articles.

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian Christianity#About the articles on Saint Thomas Christians common historyPamparam (talk) 03:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Pamparam (talk) 03:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaldean Syrian Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed Tag Comment[edit]

Lead paragraph seems to be vague and WP:POV--~~ ScitDeiWanna talk? 06:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaldean Syrian Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jacobite Syrian Christian Church which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pre Portuguese invasion[edit]

Why content is silent about Syrian migration in AD345 and AD825? Is it not fair to admit that both west and east Syrians (Syriacs and Nestorians) existed in Malabar pre 1498? Writing history with prejudice and bias will get rejected. 116.68.81.255 (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is written by people like you! Feel welcome to make the relevant additions with reliable sources. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]