Talk:Chandra Arya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chandra Arya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional criticism on Arya[edit]

As the section title says it is for criticism that I believe did not meet Wikipedia standards guidelines:

-This source is the petition which condemned Arya's criticism of the poster of the movie Kaali [1]. It argues that Arya was engaging in dog whistles.

-This source is from the Sikh Press association which criticize Arya's comments about "Khalistan extremist".[2]

- This source is from the B'nai Birth Canada, [3] points out Arya anti-Israel and that he likes to stroke racial differences.

Note I cannot up these sources since they are not considered Secondary sources but let's say these points get covered and they mentioned the source then I would think it would be okay to include them. Hiyournameis (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]