Talk:Charles Norris Cochrane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Give Chuck Norris a chance[edit]

At first i thought he was WP:NN but after a quick search he published a handful of books and there are lots of pages about him. I believe that we should give this article a chance. --Guerillero | My Talk 06:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)\[reply]

He is cited as a RS here,[here is a potental source and this --Guerillero | My Talk 06:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Kroker in this interview http://www.canadianinterviews.com/interviews/index.php?ID=138 suggests that he's Canada's leading metaphysician. And some of his works are still rather widely read...a amazon.com gives 15 hits in books.

In my opinion he meets the notability guidelines, but I am new at this so I may have got things wrong.

Best regards

Tillander 07:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Norris Cochrane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]