This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
I put the photo of the 2008 high school built on the same site back in the infobox. It's obviously not ideal, but for now it's the only pic we've got. Feel free to replace this with a photo of the old junior high if you can find one. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is misleading to put this picture in the infobox. It would be better to leave it as a separate image with the same caption. Right now, leaving the picture in the infobox makes it look like the building pictured is called Charles Y. Audenried Junior High School, is listed on the NRHP, and was designed by Irwin T. Catharine in 1930 in the Colonial Revival style, with a caption that correctly says it is none of those things. (For the same reasons, I oppose leaving the NRHP template and categories on these types of images in Commons; none of those things apply.) I think the infobox should be left for the actual, historic building, and any other images should be displayed separately. Removing it altogether was not the best choice, but I don't think it belongs in the infobox. kennethaw88 • talk 18:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I changed it around to be under the article text. OK? BTW, it is quite common for WP:NRHP editors to put in pix of the sites of destroyed buildings. It helps inform other photogs that they don't need to go to the site to get a pic. Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that is much better to me. kennethaw88 • talk 23:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
