Talk:Charlotte of Schaumburg-Lippe

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Duchess of York[edit]

"In 1890, William brought his new wife to England, where the Duchess of York commented ..." In 1890, there was no such person as the Duchess of York--the future George V was created Duke only in 1892, and married the following year. Either the date is wrong, it's really one of the other royal duchesses doing the commenting, or this should to be reworded to use the title the lady actually had in 1890 (Princess Victoria Mary of Teck) or the highest title she would attain ("the future Queen Mary commented ..."). I don't have access to the source, however, so I'm not sure what the problem is. Biblioteqa (talk) 00:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should have access to the source in question within a week or two. I will verify (I suspect it should say simply Princess Mary of Teck). Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 03:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]