Talk:Charnwood Forest Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

England Start‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Charnwood Forest Railway.

File:Loco43728.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:

File:Loco43728.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files missing permission as of 16 November 2011
File:Cfrshovel.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:1961ticket.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charnwood Forest Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219013115/http://homepage.ntlworld.com:80/candj_simmons/HaShortHistory.HTM to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/candj_simmons/HaShortHistory.HTM
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.whitwick.org.uk/history/railway.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubstantiated statements[edit]

This article seems to contain a lot of unsubstantiated material.

All of the "Remains of the Line" section is obviously original research, and uses the present tense although it was written in 2007.

Spellerweb seems to have closed down (great pity!) and some of the other references look dubious; for example the story about the vip slipping and spilling the wheelbarrow contents isn't quite as racey when read in reputable reference works ...

Not sure what to do about this. Afterbrunel (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]