Talk:Charsadda District, Pakistan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Repeatedly re-added unsourced info[edit]

The following text has been added and reverted repeatedly recently. Could we discuss it here before continuing the edit war?

the following are the main khans families in charsadda
1.. Parich Khails They are the most influential and top most Khan family in Charsadda. They are in the village of Utmanzai, Mera Utmanzai and Khanmahi. The Khans of Qazi Khel are from Parich Khails, as rajar and prang have enmity, a brother from the family was asked to stay in the area between them for peace. He was provided with the same amount of land he had left behind in his original village. The PARICH KHAILS are the desendants oF Haji Muhammad Akram khan, He lived in Khanmahi,(He is the father of GEN.AKBAR KHAN, MUHD.AZAM KHAN)
The Parich Khails of Utmanzai are the descendants of Muhammad Azam Khan,they reside in the Mohallah Tariq abad. Their family elder is Tariq Azam Khan. The Parich khails of Khanmahi village are cousins of Muhammad Azam Khan family. The village of Khanmahi was founded by Haji Muhammad Akram Khan, after his death Muhammad Hassan Khan was the elder of family who died in 1996. Muhammad Sikandar Khan is the grandson of Haji Muhammad Akram Khan of Khanmahi and is the only Engineer in the family.
2.. Kanan khel They are in the village of Rajjar and Mera Rajjar but some of these family members are in Sardehri(Wardaga) village this family is also the only top most khan family in Rajjar and Mera Rajjar

(The text goes on much longer, see the page history if you want to read the whole thing.)

I've been one of the ones deleting it, because it is entirely unsourced, it is poorly written and confusing, and it isn't really about the district that is the subject of the article. Could the Wikipedians who think this needs to be in the article explain here how it complies with Wikipedia guidelines? Dawn Bard (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's been re-added again without comment or discussion.[1] Would anyone care to discuss it? I am still strongly of the opinion that it makes the article worse, and other Wikipedians have reverted it, too. Is anyone going to explain why it is necessary, and how it conforms to Wikipedia guidelines? Is anyone reading this? Anyone? Bueller? Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was off-topic, unencyclopedic, unreferenced, garbled, personal opinion and arguably a violation of our BLP policy. I removed it. The anonymous IP reverted again. It has now been removed once again and an administrator has semi-protected the article. Thank goodness. Voceditenore (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced the project banner here with WikiProject Pakistan; WikiProject Pakistani districts is completely inactive. Their last project talk page post is from 2006. If this starts up again, I'd suggest contacting WikiProject Pakistan. Voceditenore (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charsadda District, Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]