Talk:Chase Line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

West Midlands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Chase Line.

Dates of re-opening - I'm sure the section North of Hednesford was later than 1989. The article Goose quotes states 1989 for Walsall to Hednesford, not Hednesford to Rugeley TV. I've put 1998 back for this latter section, with a request for citation. --Tivedshambo 15:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed links around Hamstead as its linking to village on IOW. Don't know enough about Hamstead in Birmingham to start a page Martyn Smith 12:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Errrmmm... it's got a railway station that used to be called Great Barr and is also served by the number 16 bus. I can't think of anything else to say about Hamstead. Is it really notable enough? 82.36.26.229 22:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great Wyrley[edit]

Why is this listed under "places served" by the line, when it hasn't been served for more than 40 years? 86.136.249.128 04:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling problem on map[edit]

There is a station (not open) shown on the map as "Wryley and Cheslyn Hay" - it should be "Wyrley and Cheslyn Hay". I cannot see a way to amend this.EmleyMoor (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--195.11.55.200 07:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - see Template:Chase Line. – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chase Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Region edit warring[edit]

@86.19.222.221 @JamesVilla44 to stop any kind of edit war breaking out, I suggest we discuss this here - as per WP:BRD. Let's hope the IP actually engages this time, as they have a history of ignoring talk pages. Danners430 (talk) 07:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]