Talk:Chervona ruta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sofia Rotaru a source on folklore?[edit]

Sofia Rotaru never studied folklore professionally, she was merely a singer, not a folklorist. Therefore another source should be cited. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Irrelevant argument.--Rubikonchik (talk) 15:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC) The incompetence of the cited source has all the relevance you can wish for. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument remains uncler to me. Sofia Rotaru made Chervona Ruta a major Eastern European hit. I think she has some "comepetence". Why not to create a section "Chervona Ruta in pop culture" then? --Rubikonchik (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The statement is not on pop music which indeed ~would be Rotaru's competence. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion[edit]

Since I can't read russian, I'm assuming that the dispute refers to the second citation, the one where sofia rotaru is quoted on the flower and it is not the existence of the flower that is being contested but rather the use of the sofia rotaru interview to assert that the flower turns red on a special day. While I agree that the singer is probably not a great source on folklore, I don't see anything wrong with the way it is used here. Though the fact that she made the song popular lends some credibility to the statement the text is quite clear that this is according to Ms. Rotaru. It does not mislead the reader and correctly indicates that this is an opinion. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 10:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thanks. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 10:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chervona Ruta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]