Talk:Chiang Mai Zoo Monorail

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This redirect is supported by the Monorail task force.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Thailand

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Chiang Mai Zoo Monorail was copied or moved into Chiang Mai Zoo with this edit on 1 October 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Suggest deletion[edit]

I suggest this article be merged with Chiang Mai Zoo and deleted. Seligne (talk) 11:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Seligne:As per your suggestion, you can put it up for WP:PROD and merge it while you wait. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 11:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion! Good idea.Seligne (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion and merging are not compatible. If content has been merged to the target article, the source article should be redirected there, so that the page history may serve as proper attribution according to the CC licence. Deleting an article requires that the content being deleted has not been used elsewhere. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for using the work "merge" in the non-technical sense. By "merge" I meant incorporate the facts into the Chiang Mai Zoo article. I believe that has been done satisfactorily. Seligne (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is no technical aspect to merging, which is always done manually. Any copying of content must be attributed; see WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. In this case, though, this article is such a short stub that hardly passes the threshold of originality, so I have nothing against deletion. Redirecting is still an option, though. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the prod with the suggestion to merge (which is not an appropriate use of proposed deletion, per above, see WP:MERGE in future for how to correctly propose merging) and so I have merged it. Thryduulf (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]