Talk:Chicopee Public Library

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

I am the author of the original content. I am in the middle of editing it for the web for wikipedia and wish to be given more time. ([User talk:Cafefrog[) 17:17, 17 June 2008

You should probably do that before creating the article. We're not going to run out of disk space any time soon. That being said, you should ideally rewrite this article from scratch, unless you're willing to license the web page under the GFDL.-Wafulz (talk) 16:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will license the website content under GFDL as the document was taken from a public city document and therefore is public domain. I will enter the statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cafefrog (talk • contribs) 17:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Websites containing local history information have been released under the GNU license. Meta tag is in the HTML. Cafefrog 17:29, 17 June 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cafefrog (talk • contribs)

Okay, thanks. Be sure to take a look at our new contributors' help page.-Wafulz (talk) 17:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's all well and good, but frankly, Wikipedia articles that are mere legal copy-and-paste jobs are not desirable. After all, it's just a regurgitation of the website. You're OK on legal grounds, but I strongly suggest that you do a rewrite. Quite honestly, the detailed history of a small-city library is not that interesting to most Wikipedia readers. This article would be much better if it were more concise and succinct, and of course the original article will still be available through the link to the web site. You don't have to do thia all at once, of course. But give it some thought. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicopee Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120123010127/http://mblc.state.ma.us/advisory/statistics/public/repmunicpie/index.php to http://mblc.state.ma.us/advisory/statistics/public/repmunicpie/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]