Talk:China–Ukraine relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is the promise to not nuke Ukraine notable?[edit]

http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/7019/a-chinese-nuclear-umbrella-for-ukraine

Hcobb (talk) 03:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on China–Ukraine relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted a section on partisan nazi pov soapboxing when this article is about diplomatic relations[edit]

I had earlier deleted a section in the article.There were so many things wrong. I read the sources and the person who wrote on wiki earlier, was just soapboxing his own pov that boldly states the whole Ukrainian nation relations with china is being troubled, etc. , which wasn't even fairly backed by his given sources. Regardless this article is about diplomatic relations. You cannot cherrypick the trivial beefs of a small select far-right members that aren't even officially affiliated with any Ukrainian political groups and go represent them as the whole country. You want to talk about the protest, there is a wiki page for that. This is the page for DIPLOMATIC relations between China AND Ukraine and not the place for flash pan events or neo-nazis or non-right-wing individuals - with no more than a thousand people maximum, and claiming to represent all of Ukraine where in reality, that is just both biased and unrealistic. Unless you have the overall gov of ukraine making such major political statements towards china and vice versa, and able to have SOLID NEUTRAL sources that can back that up. It's just not appropriate to use biased BLOG POSTS or grossly misrepresent the sources, to put a handful of fascists or activists and make them seem like they are major political players of the entire Ukrainian Chinese offical relations. Or even the representatives of their country where they barely make over 0.001 percent. This wiki page especially is NOT WELCOME to any neo-nazis writing whatever they wish and they will be reported and banned if they continue to abuse Wikipedia and make their few fascist members seem like major political players in the world and represent an entire nation, when even western mainstream media and hk protesters in general, have criticized and are firmly against them.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmjjey/what-the-hell-are-ukrainian-fascists-doing-in-the-hong-kong-protests

https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/04/ukrainian-nazis-hong-kong-protests/

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3040625/far-right-ukrainian-activists-say-they-were-only-hong-kong 49.195.164.176 (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]