Talk:Chirand/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Id4abel (talk · contribs) 15:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Done The only flaws that I could find were minor copy editing so rather than pepper the article with {{Clarify}} tags and such I just went ahead and made those minor edits. Neither images nor an infobox are required, but both would be useful additions that many people expect to see so I strongly recommend adding both of those elements. Abel (talk) 18:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Id4abelThat is really fast and nice. Thank you very much for your edits and promoting the article to GA status. There is only one img in the Wikicommons of the coins from the site but it was deleted earlier by some user as not valid. I am trying to get imgs from the site and then I will add the img with an info box. Thanks again.Nvvchar. 11:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Happy to help. It was all wording that is probably easiest to explain by seeing the examples of changing "the source kind of sort of says this" to "the source says this." There may not be any images available on commons, but if you can find some on flickr (with a compatible license) then https://tools.wmflabs.org/flickr2commons/ makes transfer easy. Abel (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]