Talk:Chitimacha language

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Updates[edit]

I just saw this report (with video) from WVUE Fox 8. The language has been rediscovered and Rosetta Stone has also created software for its Endangered language program. Night Tracks (talk) 14:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chitimacha is related to Totonacan and Mixe-Zoque[edit]

Cecil H. Brown, Søren Wichmann and David Beck [1] more or less prove that the by now reasonably well-established Totozoquean group from Mexico (Totonacan = Totonac-Tepehua + Mixe-Zoque) is in turn related to Chitimacha. This should renew consideration of Greenberg's and Ruhlen's extended Penutian concept: those controversial scholars (1) accept a Gulf group as stated in the article, (2) uniquely (as I have found) consider it to belong to Penutian, (3) posit a parallel Mexican Penutian group comprising Totonacan and Mixe-Zoque, also Mayan and Huave. If their affiliation of Chitimacha to their Penutian Gulf was not purely 'on the nod', but based on shared vocabulary and morphology, then probably (1) 'Mexican Penutian' does exist, comprising Mixe-Zoque, Totonacan and Chitimacha but probably NOT Mayan and certainly not Huave (pretty much established now as Otomanguean), (2) 'Gulf Penutian' does exist and is visibly related, comprising Muskogean, Natchez, Tunica, Atakapa and maybe others, but not Chitimacha - which is nevertheless related, merely in another sub-branch of Penutian. (Note that Greenberg and Ruhlen believe that the Yuki and Wappo languages of California are/were 'displaced' Gulf languages.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownSage (talk • contribs) 13:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar[edit]

Chitimacha has a grammatical structure which is not dissimilar from modern Indo-European languages but it is still quite distinctive.^[1]Chitimacha distinguishes several word classes: verbs, nouns, adjectives (verbal and nominal), quantifiers, demonstratives. Swadesh (1946) states that the remaining word classes are hard to distinguish but may be divided into " into proclitics, postclitics, and independent particles".^[2] Chitimacha has auxiliaries which are inflected for tense, aspect and mood, such as to be. Polar interrogatives may be marked with a final falling intonation and a clause final post-position.

Chitimacha does not appear to have adopted any grammatical features from their interactions with the French, Spanish or Americans.^[3]Jaylatarche (talk) 09:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 313. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 321. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 312. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[1] Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 313. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[2] Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 321. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[3] Swadesh (1946). "Chitimacha": 312. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]