Talk:Chris Addison

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Date of birth - the body text says 1972 but the link at the bottom says "1971 births". Which is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.10.16.7 (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1971 is correct. November, 1971 to be more precise. Riviera27 (talk) 09:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False Allegations of Apiarism[edit]

I'm as baffled as Addison is to why anyone would edit his Wiki page to claim he's a beekeeper, but he seems to have enjoyed it. In a situation, however, where Wiki articles on living and dead individuals - and other topics - are thought to be accurate, a plausible falsehood entered into one may quickly be taken and repeated in other sources.

I see no reason to clarify in his Wiki piece that he is not and never has been a member of the British Beekeepers Association. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandermacpherson (talkcontribs) 14:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you see no reason to clarify this in the article, why have you added it three times, without citing a single reliable source? You should have a read of WP:BLP, and also WP:3RR while you're at it.--Michig (talk) 14:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Of course I meant, no reason _not_ to.) I gave a reliable and fully referenced source; certainly more reliable than his stated birthdate as November 1971 (see how petty your objection looks?). If you feel my edit belongs in a sub-section or uses non Wiki-like language, by all means alter it. Any Wiki piece about a minor comedian or television personality is inherently banal and mundane and "un-noteworthy". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandermacpherson (talkcontribs) 14:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Had the 'beekeeping' claim been reported by reliable sources it may have been noteworthy, but Addison being asked about it by a cookery presenter and stating that it's a lie is not sufficient to be worth including. I can find no other reliable sources where it is mentioned at all. This simply is not worth mentioning. It's trivia. He was 38 in February 2010, by the way ([1]), so Nov 1971 is plausible. It should be properly sourced or changed to c.1971 with a source. This existing without a source does not justify the addition of other unsourced or irrelevant material.Michig (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So where is the evidence that this has any significance? Addison has appeared on dozens of tv shows where he has probably said a lot of things, it would be ridiculous to include them all in the article.--Michig (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As Addison said on the SKL broadcast, the allegations of apiarism have formed the basis of comments directed to him and his agent/office; so arguably existed beyond a single spurious Wiki edit. Including it here, I think also, adds a sense of levity to a Wiki piece whose subject is, after all, known for humour: I don't have problems with it being moved to a non-dedicated section.
I suspect you missed the rhetorical point I was making about his DoB.Alexandermacpherson (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dates of birth in BLPs should be properly sourced. 'Addison said' is not sufficient sourcing for stating it as fact - there does not appear to be any evidence that this has been mentioned elsewhere. Why on earth do you think 'levity' is appropriate in an encyclopedia article? See WP:TONE - we're not writing comedy here.--Michig (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you seriously saying that when the subject of the wikipedia article states a face it is not worthy of inclusion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.44.53 (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Veep[edit]

Should there be a subsection in the Television section mentioning his work directing episodes of the ABC series Veep? Or should it go in the Other work section? Quizman1967 (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Addison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How old are his children[edit]

His children are 17 to 18 2A02:C7C:514C:5F00:8C54:7F9A:1C94:CC2E (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Born in Wales = British Comedian, Born in England = English Comedian[edit]

Is Wikipedia trying to disrespect the Welsh? Same with Zoe Lyons. Is Frankie Boyle down as British or Scottish? 81.79.77.10 (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]