Talk:Chuxiongosaurus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

moved from article[edit]

Commentary moved from article:

"The above statement is so funny, particularly the sentence: Identified from the holotype CMY LT9401 a nearly complete skull (including a lower jaw) with some similarities to Thecodontosaurus, it was described as the "first basal sauropod dinosaur from the Early Jurassic of China," more basal than Anchisaurus. The fact is this: the skull and the lower jaw were collected by two different persons at two different times from two different localities. Furthermore, they have different museum specimen numbers.

Skull and lower jaw are not the same animal."

[added by User:Dinodragon] J. Spencer (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From the same user I moved this later commentary:

"Please see the following photo showing the skull and the lower jaw were collected by two persons on two different times at two different sites. How can this be the same animal?"

This is a very valid point and it shows our source was possibly wrong. However, we need some other published source to correct it!--MWAK (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

CXPMrecordCIMG1722.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]