Talk:Cinemetropolis

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wondering how people feel about wikifying links for many of the names on the track list. People such as Yuri Kochiyama and George Jackson have pages that could be linked to. Leeidiot008 (talk) 04:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

don't delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.48.53 (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish the page to not be deleted, please go to the linked deletion discussion, and explain why this page meets our current policies for notability. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

there is absolutely no reason to delete this article, if one person a year looks it up it is worth keeping. just because you can doesn't mean you should delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.48.53 (talk) 04:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the place to discuss this is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinemetropolis. However, Wikipedia does not choose to keep or delete articles based on the number of times people look them up. We have a set of policies and guidelines that cover which subjects can and cannot have articles. In this case, the two important guidelines are WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. The point is that since this album has not been the subject of discussion in multiple, independent reliable sources, it should not have its own article, and, instead, whatever verifiable information is available should be put in Blue Scholars. If you know of reliable sources that discuss the album, then they can be added to the article and it may then be kept. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So...it's been released...and?[edit]

It's been released for about two weeks. Have there been any notable reviews of this album? Has it or any songs on it charted on a national chart? I'd appreciate it if the supporters of the article found such references. Without them, the next step will be to go back to a deletion discussion. Remember, merely existing as an album is not enough for the article to be kept: the album must be notable, based on the criteria found at WP:ALBUM or WP:GNG; so far, this article has no independent sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cinemetropolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520234313/http://bluescholars.com/blog/update-cinemetropolis-advance-digital-download-out-now-official-release-date-june-14/ to http://bluescholars.com/blog/update-cinemetropolis-advance-digital-download-out-now-official-release-date-june-14/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]