Talk:Cinquedea

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

Okay I did a re-write of the article based on sources, but without copyright violations. — RJH 20:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page really needs a photo, because cinquedeas are truly unique in design. I have one, but how can I put it up on the article?--Voruk (talk) 02:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"In Collections" section[edit]

The entire "in collections" section is unencyclopedic original research (and aside from that, according to more OR by me using google shopping, not even particularly correct) Unless someone objects i'm going to go ahead and scrap it in a day or two. -Lehk (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This is an online encyclopedia, not a collectors guide. I've never seen a collectibles section in a weapons article, and it serves no purpose. Since the above editor didn't delete it (or was reverted), I'm going to do so. The Cap'n (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]