Talk:City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCity of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
March 22, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Tampa bay[edit]

the tampa bay devil rays are located on st. petersburg, not tampa, so why is that no problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.51.102 (talkcontribs) 08:21, 4 October 2005

Because the team doesn't claim to be from Tampa, just from Tampa Bay (which is the name of the bay St. Petersburg is located on). Matt Yeager 05:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Current event header[edit]

Jan. 16, 2006 - Because the court case between the Angels and the city of Anaheim is under way, there should be a heading above this article that it "covers a current event." I've seen a standardized Wikipedia heading for this but don't know how to enter it; can somebody help out?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.238.10 (talkcontribs) 04:23, 17 January 2006

Appeal?[edit]

Removing this obviously outdated reference:

The Angels will not file a response until June, and a decision is not expected before the end of the 2007 baseball season.

Anybody have any direct references to the appeal? Did the Angels in fact file a response in June 2007, and has anything new been decided? SixFourThree (talk) 15:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello. I am going to have to fail this article's GA nomination. Here is a list of the major issues I found with the article:

  • The main problem with this article is the lack of referencing throughout the article. There are absolutely no references before the Appeal section, which is over 2/3 of the way through the article.
  • The image of Curt Pringle is non-free use, and, in my opinion, does not improve the reader's understanding of the article in such a way as to be necessary. The image should be removed.
  • Web references need to be formatted with a title, publisher and access date at the very least. They should never be left as bare links.

These are the major problems that popped out to me on a first go-through. I have not reviewed prose, completeness or NPOV, so this is not necessarily an exhaustive list. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:WingedANA.png[edit]

The image File:WingedANA.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]