Talk:City of Sydney Relationships Declaration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The article contains the comment "Financial institutions use AUSTRAC's 100 point ID system. According to this system, customers have to show various forms of ID to make up the 100 points, in order to be able to prove their identity. This means you have to present your Relationships Declaration (25 points) along with other forms of ID such as your passport or Medicare card, in order to make up the 100 points required."

I do not think this is correct. Having just signed a relationship declaration this is not mentioned anywhere on the Sydney City Council literature. Also it is not clearly identified on the 100 point check form (form 201) http://www.austrac.gov.au/guidelines/forms/acctforms.html in either sections 8, 9 or 10.

Please add page![edit]

Title says it all for the City of Melbourne Relationships Declaration. Wikipedia please add this because Melbourne also has a Relationships Declaration programe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.60.109 (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City of Sydney Relationships Declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]