Talk:Classical Movements

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 27-09-2017 by Voceditenore.

Pianolover1979 (talk · contribs) has been paid by 8VA Music Consultancy on behalf of Classical Movements. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Declaration

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I am currently updating wikipedia with various concert touring companies beginning with Classical Movements, who is a real company that has been around since 1992.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JessicaZaluzecCM (talk • contribs)

Please have a read of WP:Conflict of interest, and wait for somebody not connected with your company to write an article about it. Thank you. Filing Flunky (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article, as written, its too promotional and JessicaZaluzecCM should not be editing it. However, there is a kernel of a decent article here and the organization appears to be notable, per the sources given. I've therefore declined the speedy deletion and suggest either there is an effort to rewrite the content to comply with WP:NPOV and/or the article is discussed at [{WP:AFD|AfD]]. There is too much to discuss to speedy this, IMHO. Sparthorse (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Sparthorse. The article is written like an ad, but could be rewritten properly, and the subject is clearly notable. I've done a bit of re-formatting, and I will do more work on it ASAP. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to contribute to this article by adding the company's history's page. Therefore, how can I contribute to the company's wikipedia page, so that the following banners might be removed: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (December 2011) This article may be written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by rewriting promotional content from a neutral point of view and removing any inappropriate external links. (December 2011). Many Thanks! (AbigailFason (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

You may not add the company's history page without going through the process described at WP:Donating copyrighted material. Even if you do go through this process, it is unlikely that the company's history page will be an appropriate addition to the article, because most companies write their own histories in ways that make the company look very good, which would constitute promotion, and is disallowed on Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Editors / Contributors[edit]

For some reason this article has attracted attention from new editors who are apparently unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. I'd like to offer a bit of advice to them...

Please stop and ask yourself why you are contributing to this article, and what the value of the information you are contributing is.

Wikipedia is not a platform for publicity, public relations, advertising, or any other activity solely aimed at improving a company. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. People who really care about this "project" are WP:HERE here to build an encyclopedia. It is here to transfer knowledge. There are several Wikipedia policies (WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:NPOV, WP:COI, and more) that cover the type of editing that has been done to this article so far.

If you want to add encyclopedic information to this article, please go ahead. If you want to increase the visibility of the subject company as part of a PR or advertising campaign, then please stop. It will get removed.

A simple test to see if your information belongs here or not is WP:RS, Wikipedia's policy on Reliable Sources. Any information that you add to an article, should be covered in a reliable, third party source—for example a news article on Classical Movements, or an article in a magazine. The company's own website is not a reliable source.

I'll volunteer to mentor anyone on how to improve this article, as long as their real reason for being here is the same as mine—to build an encyclopedia. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per this request, I've added some more citations, plus another I was able to find from a news archive to which I have a subscription. I've also copyedited the article to remove the PR hype. It's probably enough to scrape a notability pass. Voceditenore (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Classical Movements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]