Talk:Clearstream affair
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Affaire Clearstream 2 from fr.wikipedia. (393069460 et seq.) |
The Clearstream Affair did not start in 2007 + other problems[edit]
... This attempt at providing a page for the Clearstream Affair fails for several reasons.
1. It makes no mention of the fact that the Clearstream Affair started in 2001 with the release of the Denis Robert book, Revelation$ and its follow up, The Black Box.
2. It fails to follow the precedence set in the main Clearstream article which refers to the "first" Clearstream Affair 2001, ongoing, and the "second" Clearstream Affairs 2004-2007. Alternatively referred to elsewhere as Clearstream I and II, or, Clearstream 1 and 2.
3. There is reference to a "raven" or Corbeau, a spy and/or whistleblower, which needs to be explained for English speakers.
4. Under Political Impact, this page attacks Villepin as knowing about the so-called false lists, but then goes on to note he was cleared by the courts.
5. This page cites as a reference the French page Clearstream 2 but does not make the same distinction.
I am in the process of rebuilding references deleted by a former user under the same name of a Clearstream Public Relations worker, and will add them here for balance, rather than further bloat the main article. Avaiki (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaiki (talk • contribs) 02:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem[edit]
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💷Money💷emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 22:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)