Talk:Clydach Vale

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Blaenclydach?[edit]

If no-one objects, I think it would be a good idea to move Blaenclydach to this article. I believe a difference may have existed in 1900 but the adjoining communities can be considered to have intermerged long age. Blaenclydach in WP has no content except a Geograph photograph. I'm asking the photographer if he has any objection or comment. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 02:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objections here. If someone has something to say about Blaenclydach at a later date they can always write over the redirect. FruitMonkey (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's done, then. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nant Clydach[edit]

Here's a site which says the Nant Clydach is a tributary of the Taff, not the Rhondda. Any thoughts on that one? I can't find an online map which gives the answer. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The issue seems to be settled by this quote from the Welsh Government's River Taff Corridor Action Plan, April 2007, p. 7

At Quakers Yard, the Taf Bargoed and Cynon merge with the Taff and slightly further downstream the Nant Clydach joins. At Pontypridd, the Rhondda merges and the valley further broadens out and runs through Treforest towards Cardiff in the lower reaches of the South Wales Valleys. . .

So I'm changing it, and also fixing up the River Taff article. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 03:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem with this. The maps, including the Natural Resources Wales flood map which is used to define river categories show the Nant Clydach flowing into the Rhondda at Tonypandy. The Rhondda flows for another 5km to the confluence with the Taff, and therefore I think the article as edited is now incorrect. Jonathan Mead, SE Wales Rivers Trust. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Mead (talk • contribs) 14:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that the Nant Clydach is not a tributary of the Taff (as WP also says in the article on the Taff}? If so, please advise us what your revised wording would be, and provide clear references to the cited maps to verify the information. You might also need to explain any variance from the above-cited River Taff Corridor Action Plan, April 2007, p. 7 Bjenks (talk) 05:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clydach Vale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]