Talk:Co-living

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2603:8000:2401:8932:1878:2799:D8A0:2228 (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)== Why can't I edit this article? ==[reply]

Hello, I'm trying to add more important information in the history part of this article, but every time I do it it goes away. Why?2603:8000:2401:8932:15B3:DBB1:C751:5573 (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Were you logged in? Doesn't matter, look at the article history, nearly every recent change has an edit summary (i.e. reason). I see some reverts made recently, it was probably judged to be promotion by me or another editor. ☆ Bri (talk) 06:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I put the reason and explanation after I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.142.195 (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will put a bit of information on your talkpage ☆ Bri (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I see it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:2401:8932:C96E:F140:9E5B:3B85 (talk) 02:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Where is the talkpage? I can't see it 2603:8000:2401:8932:1878:2799:D8A0:2228 (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC) ☆ Bri (talk)[reply]

Page reads like an advertisement[edit]

This page reads like an advertisement. I think we should add a banner indicating that, and also revise it to have a more neutral point of view. Kerrick Staley (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just added a POV banner to the page. The article feels biased towards co-living companies and business as its main focus, when that is entirely not the only or main type of co-living situation. The business promotional focus of the article feels out of spirit with the whole concept of co-living as intentional community.

It also lacks adequate citation for some of the generalizations claimed. :DFTBA! (talk) 05:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Proposal[edit]

Coliving has been the preferred spelling worldwide since 2017, six years ago. In the article itself, it's always referred as "coliving", and not "co-living". Co-living should redirect to "Coliving", not vice-versa.

Google trends

Article on changing the spelling 83.57.74.21 (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]