Talk:Coal combustion products

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question[edit]

Which type of combustion product was released in the Tennessee coal sludge spill? Badagnani (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it--fly ash. Badagnani (talk) 03:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional / biased article[edit]

I've flagged this article with the bias and advertisement tags, since it reads like a promotional brochure for the use of coal byproducts. A neutral article under this title should deal with the chemical products of coal combustion and their environmental effects, rather than just the ways that a few of them can be industrially recycled. --FOo (talk) 17:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see what happened. In August 2010, in a series of edits, a single-purpose account replaced neutral content with the promotional current content. I'll revert that now. :) --FOo (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Fly ash into Coal combustion products[edit]

Article is laser-focused on coal at present. A merge without redirect should be done to clear out the "fly ash" heading for general flue gas ash purposes. Artoria 2e5 🌉 09:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete.

@Artoria2e5: I've added a redirect for now, but think that the idea of then writing a separate "fly ash" page for general flue gas ash purposes is fine. Feel free to write one. Klbrain (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]