Talk:Code-switching in Hong Kong

Hong Kong High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (996)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,348) • Stub-Class articles (6,665)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (399) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,248)

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Hong Kong Cantonese[edit]

How should this be consolidated with the section "Code-switching and loanword adaptation" in Hong Kong Cantonese? They deal with similar subject matter.Misterx2000 (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Examples section[edit]

What is the source for the examples in the 'Examples' section? They look more like instances of borrowing than code-switching, though some scholars do not make this distinction. I know that Milroy & Muskyen do make the distinction, so unless the examples come from Chan (2002) or Chen (2005), a source should be added. If they do come from one of those sources, a footnote should be added to that effect.

On a related note, a very large section of 'Occurrences' was removed from the page Code-switching for a variety of reasons, one of them being the tendency of such sections to attract a lot of unsourced original research. It was replaced by a small, well-sourced section of examples. Similarly, compare Eggcorn, Regional vocabularies of American English, RAS Syndrome etc., each of which makes efforts to reduce or eliminate the addition of unsourced examples. I suggest that it might be best to limit the Examples section here to a small number of well-sourced examples, and to discourage editors from adding their own original research. Cnilep (talk) 16:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Writ 2 - Academic Writing[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 1 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Serendipitysss (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Icecream209 (talk) 07:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]