Talk:CodePeer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

After receiving a deletion notice for this article, I have edited it to add more verification. I hope this will be sufficient to avoid deletion, but if not let me know what else I can do to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamieayre (talk • contribs) 14:17, 18 June 2014‎

Thanks for the message, Jamieayre. The problem here is not one of verification, but rather notability. The sources you have added don't provide much evidence that CodePeer meets our inclusion criteria. We need to see that CodePeer has attracted significant coverage in multiple reliable sources which are independent of the subject. The two references you have added to the article appear to be regurgitated AdaCore publicity material and press releases—that is, they're copied in part from AdaCore material such as https://www.adacore.com/codepeer/features/ and https://www.adacore.com/press/codepeer2-3/. Do you know of any truly independent reviews or reporting on CodePeer? If so, please list these sources here or add them to the article.

Also, I gather from your user name that you may have a conflict of interest in editing this and other AdaCore-related articles. That doesn't mean that there's an absolute prohibition on your editing of these articles, though it is very important that you are aware of our conflict of interest guideline. –Psychonaut (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick reply. I will look into this, taking your comments into consideration and edit the article accordingly tomorrow. I will also look into the conflict of interest guideline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamieayre (talk • contribs) 15:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CodePeer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140616105327/http://www.embedded-news.tv/component/resource/article/1-all-videos/91-why-is-static-analysis-a-challenge-interview-with-michael-friess-adacore?lastid=91 to http://www.embedded-news.tv/component/resource/article/1-all-videos/91-why-is-static-analysis-a-challenge-interview-with-michael-friess-adacore?lastid=91

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]