Talk:ColorADD

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 May 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

ColorADD is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 15 September 2013 by reviewer EagerToddler39 (talk · contribs).

Color Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Coloradd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cost?[edit]

Is this system subject to copyright restrictions or is it free to use? The article should state which is the case. 1.126.110.165 (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I did the research and added the information. Naluna (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

@Punkstarman added a section on criticism. They cited a YouTube video reference. This seems to meet WP:YOUTUBE-EL, since it just acknowledges that formal criticism exists? I would like to clean this section (and reference) up, but the reference given is actually my own YouTube channel, so its a weird conflict of interest. Maybe a veteran can advise. Curran919 (talk) 21:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]