Talk:Commissions and Fees

Commissions and Fees has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 23, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Sources[edit]

Jared Harris on his exit - JuneGloom Talk 21:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I created and listed his comments in the Production section. Thanks for the source! — WylieCoyote 02:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Commissions and Fees/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 21:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this, but it may take me a few days to get to it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD

~~How about "twelfth and penultimate episode".~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Work on the WP:CAPTION.~~
- ~~"Roger, Don, and Pete" is confusing because Pete is standing between Roger and Don. (either explain left to right or front left to right and back).~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Do any of these characters have articles?~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Can you follow each character with the actor. I.e., Roger (John Slattery), ....~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done — WylieCoyote (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- - ~~You also need to put Lane's actor following his name.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~(center left to right) is still confusing. Maybe (facing camera from left to right)~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~The second sentence is not necessary for a WP:CAPTION. Leave it in the text.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I always thought the caption was lengthy too. I think it was put that way to avoid image deletion (production note). — WylieCoyote (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

~~she (Christina Hendricks) looks odd. Can you rearrange to move the actor by the first mention rather than the subsequent pronoun.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please put the actor after the first character mention (Davidtz, Pare, Hamm, etc.).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Several still undone (~~Pete, Ken, Megan~~, and a few more).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lane's secretary, character name,--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~You omitted the whole ordeal about cutting him down against police advice not to tamper with the crime scene.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done except for Lane's secretary name. Anyone know it? — WylieCoyote (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, number 2. I always put the actor names after their first appearance in a scene, not first article mention, but whatever. — WylieCoyote (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Production

This is sort of the minimal acceptable amount of production content. If you could add more, that would be good.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I added the Matthew Weiner comments to the Production section. I wish we could fine a Jared Harris picture somewhere to add there, since we don't have a good look at him above. — WylieCoyote (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

~~Please link all the notable critics.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. There was only one. — WylieCoyote (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

General

are there any relevant free images to add to the article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link the work in the refs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am placing this on hold. Please respond to each concern on the following line. I will review this article within 7 days.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My current assessment of the article is
  1. It would be good if we could add the name of Lane's Secretary.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Regarding putting names after first appearance in a scene vs. first appearance in the article, I am not a regular WP:EPISODE reviewer. If I am dragging this in the wrong direction, let me know.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ~~Would still love more production content and some images, but this is not an issue that we need to quibble about any further.~~--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. there remain two works that should be linked in the refs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Only item 4 is a mandatory fix. I need some commentary on item 2. Other than that we can pass this puppy.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Wikilinked refs. — WylieCoyote (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work. I am going to pass this now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Note Concerning an External Link[edit]

I am writing about an addition I made to the external links for Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men which was automatically reverted by your bot. These links are from Kritik, the official weblog of the Unit for Criticism & Interpretive Theory, a recognized institute for cultural studies at the University of Illinois. The Unit for Criticism's multi-authored series of posts on Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men is the offshoot of a series of events including a symposium and Duke University Press book on the same topic. Each blog is authored by a recognized expert in cultural history, media studies and/or literary studies. Please do not remove this link as it does comply with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. We would be delighted to answer any questions you may have. 128.174.194.84 (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC) I am writing about the addition above that was reverted again. We are not in violation of copyright issues. Please send us any questions you may have about the links we are making to the official weblog Kritik.128.174.194.84 (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catcher in the Rye[edit]

There are some obvious references to the novel The Catcher in the Rye in this episode -- particularly the dioramas in the Natural History Museum and Glen's illicit absence from his school. After a quick search I can't find a realiable source to support this, but it would be good to include it in the article if possible. Celuici (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]