Talk:Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article would be improved by adding a Criticisms, and Success Stories sections so potential adoptees could get an idea what solutions CLSA is ideal for, and what projects might be complicated by CSLA. Also a discussion of how CSLA can be enhanced with object relational mapping technologies and code generation would be useful.

The article is an ad for the software, it needs to be rewritten[edit]

I'm willing to bet whoever wrote the majority of the article has a vested interest in the success of CSLA, the article is practically sales literature. The article doesn't give any objective or useful perspective of the subject matter, the article should be removed or rewritten.M4bwav (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good concise description of CSLA. We've been successfully using CSLA (it is open source and free) as the middleware for our WPF applications for years. The article could be improved by describing more thoroughly how CSLA can be deployed through a data portal (or not).Greggdourgarian (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The descriptions are very poor for a newcomer to understand although exciting. Yeah appears like an advertisement but can be corrected to make it more insighful into solution that CSLA provides. Venkyzealous

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]