Talk:Conisbrough

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Conisbrough/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires photographs
  2. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  3. Requires structuring into lead + sections to allow for expansion
  4. Requires copy edit for WP:MOS
Keith D (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

In which Riding?[edit]

2602:304:CDA6:51B0:AC64:A996:A00E:C445 (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

West Riding of Yorkshire. MilborneOne (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology[edit]

Cyningesburh could not have become "Conisbrough"- it would have been "Kingsb(o)rough". The modern form of the name suggests it is from cognate Old Norse Konungsborg instead. It's quite possible that both names were in use c.1000CE hence the OE name being recorded (as happened with York: Eoforwic/Jorvik).Walshie79 (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]