Talk:Contoocook, New Hampshire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: New Hampshire Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Map[edit]

Rcsprinter123 (Talk), I live here and I do not believe these boundaries are accurate to this map. Please source where you retrieved the boundary lines from. Thank you! Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a screenshot of part of a PDF document produced by the Census Bureau that shows the divisions of Merrimack County. The boundaries of the Census Designated Place of Contoocook can clearly be seen within the town of Hopkinton. This shape is shown on the map uploaded to this article. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gas) @ 20:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Would you be interested in making a slightly different map with this linked? [1]. Or, even incorporate the Hopkinton boundary as more defined? Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have used those census block maps in the past for particularly difficultly shaped boundaries but they are too much work and unnecessary for most of the thousands of places I need to do. These maps do not need to be ultra-accurate anyway, as they are really only to give an indication of the location of a place and not serve as an absolute reference of the precise shapes of the locality boundaries. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (post) @ 20:35, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understand. Thank you! Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contoocook, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]