Talk:Corneal pachymetry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh[edit]

Somebody clean this mess.. --CopperKettle 00:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose the merge of pachymeter into this article, the themes are largely the same. --CopperKettle 14:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AGREE: I was expecting the pachymeter article to provide me with the information from this article anyway. 86.141.193.150 (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree this should be merged. It's redundant to have the two articles.David on Saipan (talk) 05:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree too !! both to the merge as to the clean-up .Mattman @ Leuven 13:10, 12 april 2010 (UTC)

Ditto! It'll simplify things for readers. Bstephens393 (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with Corneal Waveform technology[edit]

I've merged these two articles as there's been no objections. I've also removed the dead links and rearranged the sections to make this article clearer. LT90001 (talk) 07:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Corneal pachymetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]