Talk:Corner Brook

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The Corner Brook Pulp and Paper mill operates four paper machines, and is owned by Kruger Inc. of Montreal, QC. The mill is a main employer in the town. Power for the mill comes from Deer Lake Power, located about 40 minutes north of Corner Brook.

207.253.13.145 18:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move.

This is the primary usage of this term, with only HMCS Corner Brook as a potential conflict. However, a simple hatnote can take care of that, as can creation of a dab page at Corner Brook (disambiguation), since the city is most likely to be the subject most sought in a search. The undisambiguated title currently points to the city article. Mindmatrix 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as nominator. Mindmatrix 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per CANSTYLE, the page already pointing here, and a city takes precedence over a ship. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 21:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per CANSTYLE, with hatnote disambiguation. DigitalC (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per the naming convention. Since the HMCS Corner Brook article is not a candidate to ever to be moved to the plain Corner Brook title, it does not give rise to a need for disambiguation. The existing hatnote will suffice. Besides, the town is the primary usage, and the ship was named after the town. Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per nomination. --HJKeats (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Corner Brook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Corner Brook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corner Brook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Population[edit]

Should it not be made clearer in the lead that Corner Brook is actually the fifth most populated place in NL and only 2nd if you are considering metropolitan areas in NL. Current lead makes it sound like Corner Brook is second largest.--NL19931993 (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]