Talk:Cosmopolis (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Filming[edit]

The following sentence in the article is unsourced and tagged since August 2011: "Filming began in May and ended in July 2011 in Manhattan, New York as well as Toronto, Ontario." I removed it because it is unsourced and because of the age of the tag. User:Varlaam insists on restoring it, and his reasoning is odd. In his latest edit summary, he states: "He shoots all of his movies here. You delete unciteds when they are inherently false or questionable, not undoubtedly accurate as this one surely is." That reason is not grounded in any policy I'm aware of. Apparently, Varlaam has a chip on his shoulder because he also reverted my removal of a wikilink for Manhattan based on WP:OVERLINK per this edit summary: "Not every English WP user is an American who knows that the universe revolves around the US of A." I don't care much about the wikilink, although we really don't need one for Manhattan, any more than we would need one for London or Dublin or Sydney or Toronto.

However, the unsourced material should go or have a reliable source (not Varlaam) to back it up. I will revert one more time and ask him to come here to discuss the issue.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://cosmopolisthefilm.com/en/news/robert-pattinson-will-be-the-leadding-actor-in-cosmopolis

Filmed in Toronto and got the budget on there too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.65.68 (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Pattison[edit]

There has been too much material added to the article about Pattison, to the point that it reads almost like a fansite. I have pared back the material (in the reception section), although probably not enough. Please don't add any more unless you can justify it. Just because something is cited to a reliable source does not necessarily justify its inclusion. The article needs to remain balanced.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Why is the plot description only 10 words? Crzyclarks (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, plot sections are completed by editors who have seen the film. At this point, unless someone saw the film at Cannes and wants to edit the section, there's nothing to go on until it has a wider release.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's much larger summaries of the plot by many sources, Rotten Tomatoes being one example. Crzyclarks (talk) 03:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crzyclarks, please take care of the problem yourself. This plot as it stands is very hard to read. Chrisrus (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cosmopolis (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]