Talk:Coventry Jets

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 June 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

	American football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Coventry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles

Untitled[edit]

Sorry guys was trying to see if you had managed to suss out how to stop people editing, we are having the usual muppets adding stuf to our Wikipedia.

Baggy

References[edit]

The page would be better if more reverences were stated. Snowman (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did request Arcticmonkey1985, who has been updating article, to add sources in March. Keith D (talk) 12:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for NPOV[edit]

I've tagged this article for NPOV violations since the article is blatantly written like a game report favoring the jets. This content is likely copied from another source. If this is the case then this article may even meet deletion criteria.

Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign!)} 15:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with deleting the article, as any copyright problem can easily be solved, and the Jets are a notable team as far as american football in Britain and Europe goes. On the other hand, I certainly agree that the article needs a complete rewrite from a neutral point of view. I'm also doubting whether honours won by the Warwickshire/Coventry Bears and Walsall Titans should be included in the infobox. Although the club has ties to these clubs (the Jaguars were formed when these two clubs merged), they should be regarded as separate entities as soccer clubs in a similar situation are (e.g. Rushden & Diamonds F.C. was formed by the merger of Rushden Town F.C. and Irthlingborough Diamonds F.C.) Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 11:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Coventry Jets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coventry Jets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225083446/http://doradosfootball.com:80/team.htm to http://www.doradosfootball.com/team.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]