Talk:Craigieburn line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Craigieburn Line Changes[edit]

As stated in this article it sum's up what changes we should expect to see added other stations on page

Please note that this will be in affect as of the 30/09/07 [1]

Adrian90 21:28, September 24 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal[edit]

Now that Broadmeadows has been extended to Cragieburn, should we now merge the two articles together?--Zack2007 13:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
feel free,if it needs to be updated Adrian90 16:06, October 1 2007 (UTC)
Merge done. Wongm 07:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craigieburn railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craigieburn railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craigieburn railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive map[edit]

@Gracchus250 sorry to make such a simple request, but are you able to reformat the size of the interactive map so that it's zoomed in a bit more and dimensioned better. I've tried playing around with it and it's a pain in the ass and I can't seem to get it quite right. If you are able to, let me know once you've done it. HoHo3143 (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HoHo3143 No worries, I've played around with the dimensions and coordinates, is that what you had in mind? If it's interfering with the table it could be moved further down the page. Also the problem with Upfield and Craigieburn is the line colour looks similar to the road colour on the map, so it's hard to see. I could change it to a generic blue or red. Gracchus250 (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gracchus250, I've darkened the colour a bit, I think it stands out better without being too far from the actual Metro line colour. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 06:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ThylacineHunter thanks for changing the colour slightly- much better and easier to see. @Gracchus250 could you please make the map a bit taller and wider. It looks oddly small and needs to be made bigger (similar to the other diagrams on the other articles). HoHo3143 (talk) 10:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gracchus250 also there won't be a track infobox so it will fill up the space a bit, whilst still allowing the table to be the size that it wants to be. HoHo3143 (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion notices moved from article[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at User talk:ThylacineHunter regarding how the Broadstore line should be included in this article. Thank you.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at User talk:ThylacineHunter regarding how the Broadstore line should be included in this article here. Thank you.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at User talk:ThylacineHunter regarding how come the line had two operators for a period of time. Thank you.

Requested move 17 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Sourcing appears in support of the originally proposed move. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Craigieburn railway line → Craigieburn line – WP:COMMONNAME swap with redirect ThylacineHunter (talk) 08:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: redirects are ineligible to be current titles in move requests, and there is no need to list the redirect, Craigieburn line, to be swapped. A title swap will happen automatically if the Craigieburn railway line article is moved as proposed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Craigieburn line service, article is (or at least should) primarily be about a railway service, not a railway line. The railway lines on which the service operates are the City Loop and the North East railway line. Suggest alternative name to be clear that article is about a service. Bagufleat (talk) 03:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Craigieburn line, oppose Craigieburn line service as per WP:COMMONNAME. Craigieburn line is the common name, as shown by [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. Is "Craigieburn line service" a name that is used anywhere? Steelkamp (talk) 04:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Craigieburn_line&oldid=1171009343"