Talk:Crime Mob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikifying[edit]

I'm not very confident in my wikifying ability. I think it's prettty close to the standard, but I'm not sure.--Jack Schitt 09:00, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sales[edit]

How much have they sold to date?

Thank you

Vandalism[edit]

There has been a lot of vandalism and POV additions to this page recently. However, I can't really find a reliable source to verify much. If anyone is able to, or able to navigate their website with more luck than I, please fix up this article. I'm trying, but having very little luck. Alcemáe T C 20:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm going to try to help out. --Alessandro 12:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Crimemobgroup1.jpg[edit]

Image:Crimemobgroup1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality?[edit]

I don't see what's so wrong with the article, despite its lack of information.... Ellenwood is not in atlanta Crime Mob went to Martin Luther King Jr. High School

Merging[edit]

I do believe that Princess' page should be merged with this one; however, I don't think Diamond's should. My reason is that since Diamond is no longer with the group, but is working on a solo project, any news about the project would not be listed on Crime Mob's page. ≈Alessandro T C 02:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that both of the girls are both solo artists though Mitchellandness1 (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the merge templates back in November. I've just removed them, since Diamond has left the group and no one has supported merging Princess, either. If someone still thinks that merging Princess is a good idea, feel free to re-add the merge template to generate more discussion. --Icarus (Hi!) 21:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crime Mob. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]